This is a directional model, not a guarantee. It estimates the revenue and value at risk when your online narrative goes unmanaged, using published research relationships and deliberately conservative coefficients. Four independent mechanisms are summed:

• Lost Revenue (sentiment gap). Each star below a controlled benchmark of 4.7 is valued at 5% of revenue — the conservative floor of Harvard Business School's 5–9% finding — capped at a two-star gap.
• Lost Deal Flow (search-narrative gap). Negative page-one results deter prospects before contact: roughly 22% / 44% / 59% / 70% at one / two / three / four results. That loss is applied only to your new-business exposure and the share of buyers who research you, then halved for conservatism.
• Lost AI Visibility (authority & citation gap). AI tools and search engines surface the brands they can corroborate. Falling short on AI citations (benchmark ~20/mo), third-party mentions & backlinks (~40/mo), and content freshness (~24 refreshes/yr) produces an authority deficit. The average shortfall is applied to your researching new-business audience and scaled by a conservative 0.4 coefficient.
• Lost Market Position (pricing power). A weak reputation forces discounting and forfeits the premium buyers pay for trust (up to ~22%). Modeled here as up to an 8% margin give-up, scaled by how far your rating and search narrative sit below benchmark.

Enterprise value suppressed applies your chosen multiple to the annualized drag — recurring lost earnings, capitalized. Adjust the multiple to match your industry.